Like many of you, I believe entering contests is about challenging yourself, no matter the outcome. As the experts say, 'The biggest person you compete with is yourself'.
Haha, did I write that?
If that were true, It would be only ME participating in the contest, judged by ME, and I'd crown ME the winner.
Congratulations ME!
Imagine Mo Farah breaking his marathon record, making his signature move in front of a mirror and saying, 'Good job Mo! Keep this to yourself.'
Come on, folks! Let's get real here. Competing is about testing our skills against others to see if we are the best. I'm usually not. The best, I mean. Sometimes I'm the worst.
Don't get me wrong; I follow the noble strategy of 'doing my best'. The problem is everybody else is ALSO doing their best, which is often better than my best! Tongue twisters aside, I usually lose, which hurts and is quite embarrassing, as anyone who's lost at cards to their child will tell you.
All my readers out there (who, by the way, are 100% winners – just reading this makes you one) may be asking WHY I lose so much.
Well, my mum (mother hen) says, 'Those judges don't know anything! Don't they know my daughter is wonderful?'
My Dad, on the other hand, (PhD, engineer, mathematician) says it's down to statistics, in other words, the detailed analysis of past events. He reminds me that most competitors lose.
In fact, EVERYONE that enters a contest (except for one) loses because there can only be one winner. From the Oscars to the Olympics to the World Ironing Championships (very pressing), you need a lot of losers.
Contest organizers are keen for you to forget this point. After all, they can't say, 'We have A winner! The rest are a bunch of losers!'
NO. That would be poor for PR. So inevitably, they fail to mention this small (but fundamentally true) fact and go for the 'don't worry, be happy' lingo. Also known as 'Make sure those losers don't start crying'.
Again, bad for PR.
'Everyone is a winner!' Really? Then why isn't everyone receiving the first prize?
'I wouldn't want to be a judge!' I would LOVE to be a judge. I'd vote for myself and win!
'It was so close!' No, it wasn't. Otherwise, it would have been a tie.
'It's all about enjoying the experience.'
If I were seeking enjoyment, I'd be in the bar drowning myself in a martini. Or two. Or three.
The bar is where I end up after they announce, '… and the winner is …' not me.
I didn't even place.
It's not fair! After all that hard work! The fact is, contests aren't always fair. The competitor who spends hours and hours preparing and deserves to win doesn't, while the one with the smug smile who always takes first prize wins. Again.
Which begs the question, why compete at all? Why not just cut out the 'middle man contest' and head straight for the bar?
Why compete? Because you can. There are only so many contests you can enter. For example, I'd love to race against Mo Farah, but that's unlikely to happen, not least because people say I run like a toddler, including arms in the air when I'm happy.
I'd also like to compete for the Nobel Peace Prize, but I haven't done anything peaceful lately.
The second reason for competing has to do with my Dad's statistics. As he frequently reminds me, 'If you don't compete, there is only one chance at winning, and that is NO chance'.
Finally, why compete? Because as Toastmasters, we are not bystanders. The best this journey has taught me is never hesitate to participate when life's opportunities present themselves.
Now, if you will excuse me, I'm off to practice my winning speech.
ความคิดเห็น